RE: SNA over TCP/IP

["Burns, Bryan" <burnsbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We do exactly that - SNA over TCP/IP using ANYNET - several times a day to
send files to an iSeries in Japan.  We started this about three or four
months ago and it has been rather painless.  No issues at all concerning
speed have arisen.

I got great help from the support line in setting up the ANYNET
configuration.

Hope this helps.
   
-----Original Message-----
From: Werner Noll [mailto:werner.noll@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:14 AM
To: 'midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: SNA over TCP/IP


Hi All,

I'll have a discussion with a customer about the best methods of data
transfer between two iSeries systems. The systems are already connected by
TCP/IP. The issue is to transfer periodically files from one system to the
other. In the past we already used SNADS functions as well as FTP. I
personally prefer SNADS, which would require the Anynet-Support. In previous
postings I read something about a slow down when Anynet is used (in
comparison with pure SNA or pure TCP/IP). Would this be remarkable?
Does Anynet realy slow down also the interactive traffic on a TCP/IP line?
Many thanks for any arguments pros and cons. 
Regards,
GEFIS Gesellschaft für
Individual-Software mbH
Werner Noll


_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.