|
> -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vern Hamberg > I think the PC must be in the middle for a couple reasons: > 1. An applet is used to log in to the 400 - validation > results could be > sent to IBM's site from the applet, I suppose. I always use > the internal > address of the 400 - never give it the router's Internet address. This must be my problem. As I said, our testing was done using the router's address, with NAT forwarding the traffic to the 400. Others, like yourself, seem to be using the internal address successfully. I was working with IBM on this one. I can't believe the support person would have missed something so fundamental, so I must not have accurately communicated my configuration to them. In any event, I'm certainly glad that the subject came up again. John Taylor
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.