|
Chris/Melinda - thanks for the tips. The joblog on 400 showed it was looking for a field name not in the table (the sql string was truncated at the 255 bytes?). I played with MS Query for hours trying to save a "Select * from ..." but every time I did that, upon re-open, all the fields were again in the Select statement. I took Melinda's advice and did MS-Query to Excel, and used Excel as the "get data". I will need to solve this in the future if you have any ideas how to get MS Query to behave. thanks jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Devous" <cdevous@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 1:17 PM Subject: Re: MS Word/Query AS400 database error > If any of the data fields are CCSID 65535, you have to explicitly turn on support in the > translation tab, but I'd think that would only cause a problem with those fields and not > the entire record. > > With a 900 byte record, I'd have to say that you shouldn't be running into any buffer > size or LOB threshold problems. > > Examine the query. Are you doing a join? Do you happen to have 2 result fields with > the same name? In Word 97 & 2K, the query string itself can not exceed 255 > characters (even though MSQuery is OK with it). If you're selecting columns by > name, try SELECT * FROM... > > Another thing that can cause this is security. Check how you connect in the DSN. > Do you use the same connection as OpsNav? Does that profile have rights to the > table(s) you are trying to access? I'd have to say it's likely because you see results in > MSQuery, but it is something to check. > > If the problem doesn't appear to be query based, see if the 400 side provider job > (QZDASOINIT) has any meaningful messages in it's joblog, and turn trace on in the > ODBC data source, let the problem happen, and look for anything meaningful in the > log. > > HTH, > > --Chris > > > > On 23 May 2003 at 11:07, Jim Franz wrote: > > > Chris, > > Both docs use the same data source (i have only one source > > identified). >From the "working" doc and the "non-working" doc - same > > source, and files are in same lib. I can preview the data from MS > > Query, so I know the dsn is working, but when I click Return to MS > > Word, I get the error. Only difference I can see is the file. As a > > test I just created a new doc, with new file. No problem. Is there a > > size limit? The failing doc is getting 30-40 fields instead of 10-15. > > jim > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.