|
Hello,
well, we are currently setting up our HA solution (DataMirror). Therefore, we had to start journalling on all production files.
The journals are located in ASP2, which has 1 (mirrored) disk drive with about 17.5GB capacity (type 6718).
We now find we have severe performance problems some times. There's an invoicing job that normally runs about 1:30 hours and now takes 2:30 w/o much change in database activity. The only other active batch job at that time is also database intensive and runs longer than normally.
My guess is these jobs are waiting for journal entries to be written. The ASP2 disk drive is very busy at that time.
Any ideas on how to confirm this?
Also, we could add a disk drive to ASP2, which should help some. Or might it be better to cancel ASP2 and add the disks to ASP1?
I've started Management Central performance monitoring to get a better look at system activity.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Oliver _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.