× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



1. Talk to the HA vendor to find out roughly how big a data packet is,
then adjust the MTU of the Ethernet interfaces & the WAN link (routers,
etc.) to accommodate that size.  You could be having problems with
fragmented packets & their overhead.

2. Up the TCP/IP send/receive buffers.  By default there are rather
small.

3. Make sure the lines are running 100MB Full Duplex.  Half Duplex can
cause problems.

4. Is your 400's system bus becoming saturated?  Can the Etherenet
adapters be moved to a less-utilized bus?

5. Try setting the TOS parm of the IP interface to *MINDELAY.

These, of course, would apply to both the source & target systems.
Updating a setting on one box may not help unless the other box is
updated as well.

HTH, John

-----Original Message-----
From: mgarton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mgarton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 9:08 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: TCP/IP Performance


My company is running one of the High Availability products to replicate

(via sockets) our corporate system to our DR system in a data center 400

miles away.  We have a 9 Mbps WAN link that is dedicated to this
process. 
The problem is that we are not able to fully utilize the pipe even
though 
the HA product shows that there are transactions backed up waiting to be

sent.  Currently we are only able to utilize 5 to 6 Mb of the pipe.  We 
have ran performance reports on production system (model 830, V5R2) and 
there are no errors on the line and the IOP is not over utilized.  We
have 
set up a separate memory pool for the HA application.  It doesn't seem
to 
make a difference if the system is busy or not.  I have tried working
with 
the HA product vendor, our network people, and the communications vendor

and nobody has found anything problems.  Does anyone have any other 
suggestions?  I was wondering if there is something that we could tweak
in 
the TCP attributes on the production system to get better throughput. 
Thanks in advance.


Mark Garton
Disaster Recovery Team Leader
O'Reilly Auto Parts

_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only.  If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then 
delete it.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose 
or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission.  We have taken 
precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we 
advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this 
message.  We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software 
viruses.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.