|
Actually, Oliver, you created the loophole yourself by not securing all the files and using adopted authority on the 5250 programs. You, or your vendor, were the ones who created the file with the bogus *PUBLIC access. Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin oliver.wenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 03/20/2003 08:55 AM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc: Fax to: Subject: Re: Security questions Vern, >I'd be inclined to have >*PUBLIC *EXCLUDE to all production data, then use your menu approach. This >is better, still not bulletproof. How do you handle query access, then? We have lots of user queries and CAX-downloads and all that stuff. How complicated does setting up and maintaining these security tools get? So, without exit-point programming or buying some security product, I cannot fix these loopholes? Thanks a lot, IBM.. Thanks, Oliver _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.