|
> Leif: >It was not relational at the time and still isn't. The relational >stuff is built on top of a basic ISAM-type database allowing >split-key alternate indices (A.K.A. logical files). Is it not relational because it doesn't provide RDB functionality, or is it not relational because it was an ISAM database adapted for RDB functionality? -Jim James P. Damato Manager - Technical Administration Dollar General Corporation <mailto:jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.