× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I use QPFRADJ and our work load changes from heavy interactive to very heavy 
batch (short cycles) and it adjust fast
enough for use.

rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I prefer using QPFRADJ.  But, remembering from the debate, I think if your
> load changes drastically then it takes QPFRADJ awhile to catch up.  I think
> someone said that it will only adjust a certain amount within a certain
> time period to not swing too far one way or the other.
>
> Rob Berendt
> --
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> Benjamin Franklin
>
>
>                       "Ingvaldson, Scott"
>                       <SIngvaldson@xxxxxxx        To:       
> "'midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>                       e.com>                      cc:
>                       Sent by:                    Fax to:
>                       midrange-l-bounces@x        Subject:  Automatic 
> Performance adjustment
>                       idrange.com
>
>
>                       02/27/2003 12:28 PM
>                       Please respond to
>                       Midrange Systems
>                       Technical Discussion
>
>
>
> I was curious about the Performance Survey last week.  I got the impression
> that the majority favored manual tuning of the system vs. automatic
> performance adjustment via QPFRADJ.  Personally, I have been a fan of
> QPFRADJ ever since it began using less than 1% of the CPU.
>
> 1.)  What can I do to manually tune the system, that QPFRADJ cannot do
> automagically?
>
> 2.)  Why would I want to spend time manually tuning the system when I can
> set up the basics and let QPFRADJ take care of the day to day(or hour to
> hour) fluctuations?
>
> Or does the majority favor setting QPFRADJ to 2 or 3?
>
> Scott Ingvaldson
> AS/400 System Administrator
> GuideOne Insurance Group
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.