Re: QRPGSRC vs. QRPGLESRC -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: QRPGSRC vs. QRPGLESRC
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:20:05 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Good summation Scott:
"Neither method seems to me to be significantly better than the other.
There are workarounds for all of the problems caused by one method or
another."

Like F17 in PDM and selecting only certain types.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: QRPGSRC vs. QRPGLESRC , Vern Hamberg

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.