RE: Problems FTP'ing a save file from PC to AS/400

Steve...I am with you.

If it will help expedite an answer to my future questions
I will be willing to be on the "wrong ptf level" and
Not know the difference between ordering SF99510 and being on
CUM level XXXXXXX all the time too.

Maybe if there was a specific PTF or PTFs that someone was mentioning
That potentially fixed this FTP problem along with the ranting/raving
It would bring some value to the discussion.

Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Landess [mailto:steve_landess@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:28 PM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Problems FTP'ing a save file from PC to AS/400

Whatever...

I still don't have a meaningful answer to my original question.  I don't
understand why you guys are so caught up in the terminology that I used,
rather than trying to help me solve a problem.  You continue to give me
a
hard time about things that have absolutely no relevance to the issue at
hand.

I appreciate your corrections, Bill.  I am wrong.  Dead wrong.  I have
always been wrong, and I will always be wrong in the future.  OK?

But other than Jim Norbut's suggestion to change the TCP inactivity
timeout
limit via CHGTCPA, (which I cannot try yet since I am work), I haven't
received any help other than people like you and Rob trying to correct
my
terminology.

You must be an only child...

Steve


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill" <billzbubb@subdimension.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Problems FTP'ing a save file from PC to AS/400


> Steve Landess wrote:
> > If you re-read my message, you'll see that I said "running V5R1M0,
> > with cum SF99510".
> >
> > Now, go to IBM's iPTF web site:
> > which has the table of recommended fixes.  You'll see that I was
only
> > using the terminology given by IBM.  It says "CUM Package" on the
> > left-hand side.
> >
> > Sorry if I was a little touchy, but I don't think I was wrong...
>
> Steve,
>
> In this case you are incorrect.  SF99510 is the "signal" to the PTF
process
> that the orderer wishes to obtain the latest CUM for OS/400 version
5.1.0
.
> Stating you are on the latest CUM and referencing that PTF signaler is
> misleading and meaningless.
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.