|
This is a multipart message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] The entire thing was a rant. The reason I believe that, is you probably wouldn't have asked those questions if the person was desiring to transfer data from the other machine to the iSeries. Or from one iSeries running MAPICS to one running BPCS. Would you? Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com> Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com 12/23/2002 03:18 PM Please respond to midrange-l To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> cc: Fax to: Subject: RE: Migrating from AS/400 to MicroFocus > From: rob@dekko.com > > Dale, when I read Joe's response I kind of blew it off as a worthless > rant. While Brad's response was a bit sharp it was quite to the point. Hey, read it how you want. I'm not apologizing for anything. If I were moving a MicroFocus application TO the AS/400, I'd have already put in place all the steps and procedures I outlined. Why? Because I'm used to doing real business application deployment. Which part of my stuff was a rant? I asked simple, Deployment 101 types of questions. Things that anyone on a implementation project should have asked: 1. Who is our vendor support contact? 2. How long will the migration take? 3. What are the test plans? 4. How long will we run parallel? 5. What are the cutover deliverables? Horrors! I pointed out things that Mr. McDaniel should have considered before this migration started! And I wasn't warm and fuzzy about it! Oh no! I wasn't programmatically correct! By not pointing these things out, it's tacit agreement that it's okay to be "starting a migration project" without having all these things in place. What do you think this guy's chances are without these things? This idea of "migrating off of the AS/400" has a lot more to it than meets the eye, and I pointed that out. Including the fact that there ARE support groups like this for the AS/400, while I'm not sure there are the same for MFCOBOL. So I didn't coat things in saccharine. Oh well. At least I introduced a list of things he should consider during his project. But Rob, you and Michael once again spend bandwidth SOLELY to lambaste my lack of kindness and gentleness. Even going so far as to say Brad was "quite to the point" calling me a jerk. Gz, Rob, tell the people what you REALLY think about me. Anyway, hope it's worth your time. Gotta run. Joe P.S. I'm not stressing on this, Rob. I just think misinformed things need to be pointed out. I didn't make a single reference to Brad being in any way deficient or unintelligent or a jerk. Just that his project plan was lacking. If that's enough to get flamed, then I think perhaps it's not ***ME*** who's stressed <smile>. _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.