|
> From: Mark Phippard > > Maybe we should be picking on iSeries Developers--ourselves. I can't agree with you more, Mark. I've been fighting two separate battles over the last couple of years: one against those in the non-AS/400 community who would compare platforms unfairly, and one against the AS/400 community to get them to start writing some code, darnit! The former is the discussion I've been having the last couple of days: the AS/400 is "a better Linux than Linux", to paraphrase the old OS/2 ads. And please, Linux devotees, don't beat me up. I mean only that the AS/400 can run Linux and OS/400 at the same time, is all. > If the iSeries is as great as we all say, and I am just as big an iSeries > bigot as anyone, where are all of the great applications to show for it? > Where can a small business get an application as good as say Goldmine to > manage their sales, and isn't that where a lot of businesses will start? > After all, this thread started with a message that the iSeries is losing > the small business battle. I think it is losing because the applications > are not there. The operational characteristics of the iSeries fit the > needs of a small business perfectly, but where is the software? Please do > not suggest a green screen application. > > What size company do you have to be before the iSeries starts to make > sense? A small business starting from scratch is not likely going to > build their own applications, nor should they. What is the likelihood > that the applications that are appropriate for their business will involve > an iSeries? Absolutely. Positively. We need a new paradigm. We need a new architecture. We need a tool that will allow us to write an application on a desktop that we can test all the way through, then send the database specifications up to the AS/400 and let it act as the business rules processor. We probably need two new languages, one to define business rules at a meta level and one to define business UIs. I hear the latter is being tossed around already. Screw the .NET and SQL and ODBC and VB crap. Write applications that are truly platform independent, and then plug in the right piece in the right place. You'll be able to configure the application to have a thick client interface using SWT on Windows, but a web interface running on a FreeBSD box. Both will communicate with business logic running on the AS/400, which will access mission critical data locally and large amounts of historical data off of a Unix server farm. Or you can take the exact same application and switch it all (except the thick client interface) to run on a model 270. Enough already. I've ranted all day today, and I've got Christmas shopping to do still <grin>. Take care, y'all. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.