|
<snip> Well, if you look at what IBM is doing, why would they continue supporting OS/2? I would assume in the long run it is cheaper for them to support their Linux route and merge any type of unique technology to that. </snip> Hell yea. Why would they continue to support a product that works the way it's supposed to. Thanks, Mark Mark Walter Sr. Programmer/Analyst Hanover Wire Cloth a div of CCX, Inc. mwalter@hanoverwire.com http://www.hanoverwire.com 717.637.3795 Ext.3040 /"\ \ / X / \
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.