RE: "Prior Inventions" on employment contract

[Dan <dbcemid@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Joe Pluta <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Not a chance I'd sign this.  Under any circumstances.  And if I was
> turned
> down for a job because I didn't sign it, I'd seriously consider a
> lawsuit.
> It's the product of a lawyer gone mad.  The original idea was
> probably to
> protect the company from someone developing a competing product on
> their own
> time, but the wording is ludicrous.
>
> "Employee agrees that (s)he has no ideas...that relate in any way..."
>
> Give me a break.  This is an incredibly broad statement.  I've
> noticed
> similar things in other contracts, but this one is the worst.

But, isn't Exhibit "B" the place where I would retain my ownership
rights?  And, if so, would I presume correctly that detail, detail,
detail trumps over a broad "everything on my cd" statement?

TIA, Dan

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com