Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
Hi Martin I suppose one reason is, less typing. I like the flexibility of NAMEFMT 1 but weary of the extra typing for LIB/OBJ stuff. And you always need to put in a QUO SIT NAM 1 to be sure you can do it. And you're right, it does not do IFS. Regards Vern At 04:01 PM 11/16/02 +0000, you wrote:
:) I only ever use namefmt 1, so I hadn't realised that 'shortcut' doesn't exist in namefmt 0. What reasons are there to use 0 over 1 - it seems too limiting to me, particularly as (I assume) you can't do IFS stuff with it. Regards, Martin
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
