× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. November 2002

RE: Force fed LPAR

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

Rob  system software licenses for openers is what I had in mind vs  ISV
product which in many cases there is a serial numbered license ans LPAR saves.
BY seat  for BPCS  is different


At 03:55 PM 11/8/2002 -0500, rob@dekko.com wrote:
>This is a multipart message in MIME format.
>--
>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>You are not necessarily saving money versus multiple machines on software
>cost.
>BPCS charges per user, not tier pricing.  Therefore it is a wash.
>EDI charges per tier.  Therefore a separate machine is often cheaper.
>
>
>Rob Berendt
>--
>"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
>safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
>Benjamin Franklin
>
>
>
>
>Glenn Ericson <Glenn-Ericson@att.net>
>Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
>11/08/2002 01:58 PM
>Please respond to midrange-l
>
>         To:     midrange-l@midrange.com, <midrange-l@midrange.com>
>         cc:
>         Fax to:
>         Subject:        RE: Force fed LPAR
>
>
>--
>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>For  every LPAR partition  above the first you are saving a lot on
>the  repeated software costs if these were  physically separate systems.
>Inter LPAR  communications is  magnitudes faster then or inter systems
>communications and  Virtual LAN is free, OptiConnect is minimal.
>
>We've  done several  systems and it is great and  getting better every
>release.
>          Glenn
>Glenn Ericson
>
>OS Solutions International
>NYC Phone (718)898-9805  Fax 718 446 1150
>http://www.os-solutions.com
>mailto:gericson@os-solutions.com
>
>At 12:23 PM 11/8/2002 -0600, McGivern, Tom wrote:
> >It all depends on WHY you are considering Lpar...  If you can run it on
> >a single Lpar (or system), then great.
> >I'm reading through the thread of folks who have consolidated 15 systems
> >into 1..
> >We have an 830, with 4 lpars...  One in english, 2 in DBCS (Simpl. And
> >trad. Chinese), 1 boot.
> >Now, you say you can have Multiple DBCS languages on a single system...
> >But it's not supported with JDE OW.
> >
> >We'll be adding an additional Lpar for another english system, not
> >because it technically can't fit with the other english, but that we'd
> >be running everyone from Austrailia, Mexico, US, and Europe all on one
> >system.  This limits our outage window for backups and PTFs, and thus,
> >LPAR increases uptime from a user perspective.
> >
> >So.. Timezones.. .Languages..  Lpar answers our needs...
> >
> >Could we do this across multiple systems?  Yes.. But since we're dealing
> >with timezones.. When Austrailia is in their backup window... I can
> >swing the processors/memory over to the US/Europe Lpar..   Same with
> >China, Taiwan..
> >Lpar has worked great for us...
> >
> >Any additional disk you say?  Well, some for the LIC and OS.. But what's
> >the cost of an 8GB disk, 4K?
> >The tape controller IOP is switched between the lpars.. No additional
> >cost  (where if it were separate systems it would cost us... So in this
> >since, we're saving money..)
> >
> >
> >We're looking at upgrading to the 890, 8 lpars...
> >
> >Maybe it's not for everybody, but I'm very pleased with it.  If they
> >could only get the Z-series Prism logic to dynamically adjust CPU
> >allocation..
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com]
> >Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:44 PM
> >To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> >Subject: Force fed LPAR
> >
> >
> >This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> >--
> >[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> >IBM is really pushing LPAR.  Probably for a number of reasons.
> >A)  It sells disk and more cards.
> >B)  It increases complexity of your operation, thus perhaps selling
> >services.
> >C)  It drastically increases the amount of your downtime.  Perhaps
> >selling High Availability solutions, which may help sell services.  For
> >instance, if I run 4 partitions on V5R2 and I want to go to the next
> >release, won't I have to do 4 upgrades?  IBM charges $3,500 a upgrade
> >therefore wouldn't they get 4 times what they would have gotten out of a
> >single partition machine?  Granted, we do our own upgrades, but I don't
> >think you can upgrade all partitions at once.
> >
> >We've recently consolidated multiple machines onto one.  IBM's
> >insistence that we use LPAR to 'reduce cost' of some of their products.
> >Their insistence that we run LPAR if we want to currently run the latest
> >and greatest Domino, Sametime and Quickplace on one iSeries.  And other
> >attempts to ram LPAR down our throats is upsetting.
> >
> >Rob Berendt
> >--
> >"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> >safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
> >_______________________________________________
> >This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> >list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe,
> >unsubscribe, or change list options,
> >visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> >or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> >Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> >at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
> >
> >
> >This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you
> >are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to
> >others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please
> >delete this communication from your system.  Failure to follow this
> >process may be unlawful.  Thank you for your cooperation.
> >_______________________________________________
> >This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
>list
> >To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> >To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> >visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> >or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> >Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> >at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>--
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
>list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.