|
Evan: It's been years since I've done much with Query/400 (pretty much ever since I first learned about QM queries), so I'm not familiar with the 'report layout tools' that are available through Query/400. My experience was that QM forms provided a better output specification capability than Query/400. Maybe Query/400 has advanced. Can you describe a couple significant advantages that Query/400 has? Tom Liotta midrange-l-request@midrange.com wrote: > 11. Re: SQL VS QUERY (Evan Harris) > >you don't consider the report layout tools an advantage ? > > >>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] >>The only advantage that Query ever had over SQL was the ability to direct >>mail merge with OV/400. Since OV/400 went the way of the dodo bird that >>is not a concern anymore. When you have SQL you also get STRQM. Which >>can be configured to work like Query, or like SQL. -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 x313 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.powertechgroup.com __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
