RE: Tabs in SEU

["Reeve Fritchman" <reeve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh, there's a recovery facility in CODE?  Another April Fool's joke I'm
sure...I crash 2x-4x daily and a recovery facility is news to me.  I've
always had to go digging into TMP to recover to source.  Then I have to kill
the server job with the lock on the member so I can replace the source
member.

Sorry to be cranky, but it's the way it is...

-rf

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Joe Pluta
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:33 PM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Tabs in SEU

> From: rob@dekko.com
>
> The biggest problem is that SEU is so full of bugs compared to Code/400.
> However the SEU bigots call these bugs 'limitations'.  And they believe
> that if it can't be done in SEU then it really can't improve their
> productivity.

I guess I'm clueless here.  I use both SEU and CODE/400, but if you had to
classify me, I'd be more towards the SEU end of the spectrum.  And while
I've created thousands of source members with SEU, I must not be a power
user because I can't remember the last time I saw an SEU bug.  And I love
the PDM interface.

One relevant issue: if I'm in CODE/400 in one window and SEU in another, and
my PC crashes, I'm far more likely to be able to recover my changes with SEU
than with CODE.  Personal experience of course, but I still think SEU is a
really productive interface.

Joe

_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.