|
Steve, Not sure if it exactly fits the bill, but you may want to examine Scott Klement's FTPAPI. http://klement.dstorm.net/ftpapi/ Eric DeLong Sally Beauty Company MIS-Project Manager (BSG) 940-898-7863 or ext. 1863 > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Landess [mailto:steve_landess@hotmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:34 PM > To: midrange-l@midrange.com > Subject: File transfers between central AS/400 and multiple branch > AS/400's > > > All: > > Around 12 years ago I wrote a system for a client that uses > the AS/400 File > Transfer Subroutine (FTS) to allow send/receive of files > dynamically between > systems WITHOUT having to set up SNADS and use SNDNETF, RCVNETF, etc. > > For those of you who are not familiar with FTS, it is a > carry-over from the > System/36, and it can be used to transfer source members > and/or data files > between AS/400 and System/36 systems, as well as AS/400 <-> > AS/400 systems. > In the beginning ALL of the remote systems were S/36, but > over time they > were replaced with AS/400's. Now there are 30 remote AS/400's, with 1 > central AS/400. > > This system was designed to be robust and fairly bullet-proof over the > existing SNA network. There is a master file on the central > AS/400 that > designates which files need to be either sent or received > daily to/from the > remote system, and it works either over a leased line > environment OR it will > create the necessary Dial-up SDLC configuration objects, use them, and > delete them when finished. > > They now want to perform this functionality via the internet > over a VPN > connection. > > My first thought was that we could possibly adapt this system > to use an SNA > over TCP/IP configuration (MPTN) as the underlying > communications framework > along with the existing programs, but I'm not exactly sure > how viable or > stable that it would be, or if this technology will even work > over a VPN. I > haven't heard a lot (either good or bad) about using MPTN. > > They have used batch FTP scripts from the central AS/400 on > an ad-hoc basis > to perform some file transfers, but I don't feel extremely > comfortable with > the error-handling using this approach. > > How hard would it be to write Sockets code to replicate what > FTS does? Has > anyone already done something similar to this? > > The optimal solution needs to be: > > 1) Dependable. If it determines that a file did NOT get > sent/received > properly, it should retry X times before it reports a failure. The > environment is basically operatorless. > > 2) Easy. The current system is intuitive and easy to use, > manage, and > maintain. > > 3) Include all source code. Since the current system was > custom-written, I > would guess that they want all source code. The client will > most probably > want to make some modifications to the software to add additional > functionality. > > > If you are a software vendor with a solution, please send me a private > message..steve_landess@nospam.hotmail.com (take out the nospam.) > > > Thanks in advance for your help.... > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.