|
Your response regarding why we cannot find iSeries Express information through your "improved" search engine is inadequate. But it fits a pattern. I have never understood why it is so hard to get to the Client Access home page from InfoCenter. There IS a link to Client Access Express (now called iSeries -- notice, iSeries -- Access) on InfoCenter but the link to the home page of iSeries Access is buried. I don't expect you to include Personal Communications in your search domain. I DO expect the explicitly tailored, customized variant, to be included. Please open your eyes and listen to your customers - iSeries Access is THE recommended client for interactive use of the iSeries -- recommended by YOUR people! You have no other client option that you push so hard. Since when should this NOT be a part of whatever you call your information sources? At 04:36 PM 9/7/02 +0200, you wrote:
Neil Palmer, and other people in this list: When I read your post, Check this out: http://www-912.ibm.com/supporthome.nsf/document/27574128 I thought "let's try this *improved* search, see how good it is". Some weeks ago, I asked a question on compatibility of ClientAccess V3.2.0 and Windows/XP, and Bryan Dietz pointed me to the right URL: "your answer is here --> http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/access/supportedos.htm" which I really appreciated. So I went to the *improved* search:: <http://www-912.ibm.com/supporthome.nsf/document/27574128> and tried it, going to <http://www-912.ibm.com/ImprovedSearch/Search.jsp?selScope=More&q=> , with "Select iSeries search options" in the pull down on top (as suggested) and search for: 5763-XD1 AND V3R2M0 AND Windows XP which was my original headache. I was expecting to get, at least, the page mentioned above from B.Dietz, where I got what I needed. What did I get ? Just one reference to a PSP ... So, using the "feedback" available in the search , I told people in care of this "improved search" about what I had expected vs what I had got, adding "Not very helpful this "Improved Search", isn't it? Now I got their answer (follows): My question is, do you think (as the answer seems to say) that ClientAccess does not deserve to be included in or be part of the iSeries and AS/400 Technical Web Site ? Re: Search Functionality Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:08:01 -0500 From: "InternetSupport" <isupp@us.ibm.com> To: afvaiv <afvaiv@wanadoo.es> Antonio - The "Improved Search" is not as broad as the search you are trying to perform. What it does is allows you to search for technical information from separate interfaces and web sites. Although, you can now search several sources with one search request, it does not cover sites external to the iSeries and AS/400 Technical Web Site. Areas/Support information included is the Software Knowledge Base, iSeries Information Center, Redbooks, APARs, and PTF Cover Letters. The site you refer to: http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/access/supportedos.htm> is not included in the Software Knowledge Base, iSeries Information Center, Redbooks, APARs, or PTF Cover Letters.
But iSeries Access is contained in all of the above, as a subcategory. So SOME information is found there. Why not add it to the list?
This is the Integrated Application Server Web site which is different that the iSeries and AS/400 Technical Web Site. Hopefully this will clarify why the "Improved Search" did not provide you with the results you expected to see. Thanks again for using electronic services!
It explains what IS the situation, not WHY it is the way it is. This only shows me that the left hand does not seem to know what the right hand is doing. Is this something the iSeries Access people have to get going with? Are they the ones dropping the ball?
Internet Support Team isupp@us.ibm.com www.ibm.com/eserver/iseries/support
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.