|
Jim, Both the 50GB QIC drives and the 3580 Ultrium have good reputations and good performance. As an external device, the 3580 will require an additional maintenance charge (not high, but it's there). The 3580 will also require a controller card (#2749 PCI Magnetic Media Controller). The QIC drive will run off your internal IOP and should be included in your current maintenance contract. That said, here are some specs. All numbers are raw data and can be doubled to give approximate figures for compressed data. The QIC, when using SLR100 tapes, will hold 50 GB and transfer data at 5 MB/Sec. The 3580 will hold 100 GB and transfer data at 15 MB/Sec (with a #2749 IOA). Needless to say, either of these drives will blow away the performance of your 8 mm. I don't have easy access to cost of media, but that should also be included in your calculations. If you have bad memories of that ridiculous tape-tensioning stuff that used to occur on QIC drives, that has been eliminated and is no longer a factor. Either drive would be a good choice. Both will hold a full system backup on a single tape. Both will be very fast compared to your current system. Regards, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse > On Behalf Of Jim Franz > Subject: 3580 ultrium tape vs QIC > > Can anyone comment on how they like/dislike the > 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (single unit) for a > 70 gig model 270 versus a high speed 1/4 inch > cartridge. The single 3580 is not much more than > a high speed QIC. > (dumping 8mm) > jim franz
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.