3580 ultrium tape vs QIC -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: 3580 ultrium tape vs QIC
From: "Jim Franz" <franz400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:57:59 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Can anyone comment on how they like/dislike the
3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (single unit) for a
70 gig model 270 versus a high speed 1/4 inch
cartridge. The single 3580 is not much more than
a high speed QIC.
(dumping 8mm)
jim franz
--

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: 3580 ultrium tape vs QIC , Andy Nolen-Parkhouse

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.