Re: V5R2: SQL enhancements

[Evan Harris <spanner@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Given that they don't have a QSYS.LIB file system I don't really see that
the gain is worth breaking the "Q" library rule of thumb, but I take your
point.

Seems to me that this could cause some backup programs to be revisited :)

> This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> To keep it compatible with other DB2 platforms.
>
> Rob Berendt
> --
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> Benjamin Franklin
>
>
>
>
> Evan Harris <spanner@ihug.co.nz>
> Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
> 09/05/2002 02:50 PM
> Please respond to midrange-l
>
>
>         To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
>         cc:
>         Fax to:
>         Subject:        Re: V5R2:  SQL enhancements
>
>
> Hi Rob
>
>   I wondered why the hell they dropped the Q prefix....
>
> Regards
> Evan Harris
>
> >This is a multipart message in MIME format.
> >--
> >[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> >I was reading the following:
> >What's new in DB2 Universal Database for iSeries and V5R2
> >http://isource.ibm.com/cgi-bin/goto?on=naa5ab0910
> >(Great article by the way).
> >
> >When I saw that V5R2 has a new library, SYSIBM.  Does this replace QSYS2,
> >or are they duplicates of each other?
> >
> >Rob Berendt