Re: Cursor C1 already open

["Adam Lang" <aalang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If that is the case, it is stupid.  Why the hell would they make the OLE DB
provider NOT backward compatible?

Especially for the fact that IBM only supports CAE 5.1 on XP.

And we can't upgrade to 5.1 anytime soon on the actual box since we use
office vision apis.

I could see if I was trying to use some new feature in a 5.1 ole db that the
4.4 OS doesn't support, but the same code that runs conencting to a 4.4 OS
should work whether I use a 4.4 ole db or a 5.1 ole db.

Christ, I am jsut trying to do a simple select query.

Grrr, this situation has me aggravated.

But, you could be right and the provider is handling cursers differently
than the OS is handling them.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Waterbury" <mark.s.waterbury@worldnet.att.net>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: Cursor C1 already open


> Hello, Adam:
>
> I am not 100% certain, but I think this is "working as designed"...
>
> If I understand your situation correctly, you upgraded your PC
> to CAE 5.1, but the AS/400 to which you were connecting was
> at OS/400 V4R4.  I do not think this is a "supported configuration".
>
> In other words, I can understand how you may be able to continue
> to use an older version of CA/CAE with a newer version of OS/400, but not
> vice versa.
>
> Perhaps someone from IBM can shed more light on this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark