Re: upgrade

[Portal39@xxxxxxx]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
In a message dated 8/26/2002 11:47:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
pmassiello@os-solutions.com writes:


You are saying towards the end of October the very  end.

>
> Perhaps V5R2 is more stable because there are less people running it
>
>                                              than are running V5R1, so
> therefore less people are reporting bugs.  I
> would not upgrade a production system to V5R2, until October.  This will
> allow for atleast one Cum-tape to be available after the official GA
> date of end of August.  What is the reason to go to V5R2?  Unless there
> is a feature that you just have to have, then it makes sense.  For
> instance, if you just bought an 890 then you would  need to run V5R2.
>
>    JMHO
>
>     Pete Massiello
>
> MWalter@hanoverwire.com wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >We are scheduling an upgrade from V4R5. I've heard that V5R2 is more
> stable
> >than V5R1 and it may be advantageous to upgrade directly to V5R2. What is
> >your opinions on this issue?
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >
> >Mark Walter
> >Sr. Programmer/Analyst
> >Hanover Wire Cloth a div of CCX, Inc.
> >mwalter@hanoverwire.com
> >http://www.hanoverwire.com
> >717.637.3795 Ext.3040
> >
>