× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Possible, but a LOT of work.  The functionality that is built into that
command is intense.

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin




Scott Klement <klemscot@klements.com>
Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
08/26/2002 11:51 AM
Please respond to midrange-l


        To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        cc:
        Fax to:
        Subject:        Re: Customer unsatisfied:  Case for Open Software?



Rob,

Is it possible (by manipulating the library list, etc) to write your
own SNDDST to work around this problem?

Just a thought...


On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 rob@dekko.com wrote:
>
> While I prefer using Dave Leland's SNDEMAIL versus SNDDST I have a
number
> of existing applications which use SNDDST, including our cruddy paging
> software from the dolts at LXI.  (Message toned down to not get
rejected).
>
> We've switched paging companies - not paging software.  This new paging
> company has a dash in their email address.  Evidently SNDDST does not
> allow you to use a dash in an email address if you send out with *MSG
and
> not *LMSG.  Regardless of the amount of money I throw at IBM, they have
no
> intention of fixing SNDDST.  Their suggestion is to change all of my
> existing applications to use *LMSG.
>
> Here is the hoot.  My paging software doesn't not directly support an @
> sign in an email address.  Therefore I cannot send email using SNDDST
with
> the *LMSG option.
>
> The paging company says they are working on a new version that will
imbed
> their own emailing - (the b*st*rds will probably try to charge extra for
> that).  They also claim to be improving the error recovery on
> communication sessions.  But, after harping on them for years to finally
> admit they need to do so, I don't know if I can wait for them to
actually
> make the change.  But I don't know if I have a choice.  The boss won't
> spring for new paging software - even when enticed with discounts.
>
> Rob Berendt

_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.