Re: upgrade

[Pete Massiello <pmassiello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Perhaps V5R2 is more stable because there are less people running it
than are running V5R1, so therefore less people are reporting bugs.  I
would not upgrade a production system to V5R2, until October.  This will
allow for atleast one Cum-tape to be available after the official GA
date of end of August.  What is the reason to go to V5R2?  Unless there
is a feature that you just have to have, then it makes sense.  For
instance, if you just bought an 890 then you would  need to run V5R2.

   JMHO

    Pete Massiello

MWalter@hanoverwire.com wrote:

>Hello all,
>
>We are scheduling an upgrade from V4R5. I've heard that V5R2 is more stable
>than V5R1 and it may be advantageous to upgrade directly to V5R2. What is
>your opinions on this issue?
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mark
>
>
>Mark Walter
>Sr. Programmer/Analyst
>Hanover Wire Cloth a div of CCX, Inc.
>mwalter@hanoverwire.com
>http://www.hanoverwire.com
>717.637.3795 Ext.3040
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>.
>