RE: Dumb Q - SAVF to NT

[Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Tom

I've just begun using this approach. I've also seen some oddities, esp.
with regard to CCSIDs. It's reported as 0 for anything on a /QNTC object.
Therefore, CPY fails when I specify *OBJ or *STMF (which one?). I've used
1252, Windows CCSID and have had good fortune.

FTP worked for me, using binary transfer, I think.

At 07:16 PM 8/15/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Vern:
>
>FTP direct to /QNTC, hum? If it works, I like it.
>
>However... I've been battling /QNTC issues for a couple months through PID =
>(or PWD or whatever it's called this month) and no hint of resolution yet. =
>The best defense I've seen is to have as many alternative sequences as you =
>can possibly get. Different sequences seem to work depending on whether you=
>  go with text or binary, or AS/400 to AS/400, or AS/400 to Win2K, or V5R1 t=
>o any, or V4R5 to any, or Java versus ILE RPG, etc., etc.
>
>I began with the streamfile APIs in ILE RPG and expanded from there dependi=
>ng on the combination of source and destination systems and operating syste=
>m version/release/fix levels. As long as I stick with a known source and a =
>known destination, I can make it work. But once the solution needs to insta=
>ll on "any" AS/400 and transport through /QNTC to a destination that is dep=
>endent upon the network path given, the single solution becomes unpredictab=
>le.
>
>Fiona can use all the suggestions she can get.
>
>Tom Liotta
>
>midrange-l-request@midrange.com wrote: