|
At 02:58 AM 8/9/2002, you wrote: >I don't agree with that argument but you should get it PTFed. It's >broken so get it fixed for the benefit of others. There are too many >instances of people coding around IBM defects (e.g., the QtmhCvtDb >example recently raised here) where the standard practice seems to be >"Oh, it's broken. Don't use it. Do this instead." when the proper >solution is to get the defect fixed by IBM. Don't get me wrong ... it's broken, it should be fixed. We, however, can't wait for a PTF to be released ... so we have to make the necessary changes to work around the problem. Once a PTF is released, I suspect we will advise our customers to load the PTF anyway. david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.