|
From: Goodbar, Loyd (AFS-Water Valley) > I find that very difficult to believe. Every other SQL database I've worked > with all contain some type of proprietary extensions > At least on the AS/400, SQL has to support the standard collection.table > naming convention and the AS/400-specific library/file convention. > > From: Al Barsa [mailto:barsa@barsaconsulting.com] > > IBM has embraced SQL on our platform as an industry standard. I do not see > IBM making proprietary enhancements to SQL. If anything, SQL is a lowest > common denominator statement for the platform, > Maybe what Al means is "beyond what they already have made".... I.e., no changes at all to DB2. DB2 is frozen stiff and unchangeable (also known as "stable").
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.