RE: File attributes PF38, LF38, PF38-DTA, PF38-SRC

OK - I see your point.  I never qualify library in LF source, just depend
on *LIBL.

...Neil





"Dan Bale" <dbale@samsa.com>


        To:     <midrange-l@midrange.com>
        cc:
        Subject:        RE: File attributes PF38, LF38, PF38-DTA, PF38-SRC


Would an native LF source member know what to do with:
     A                                 PFILE(FILEOBJ.LIBRARY)

Isn't that the correct syntax for s/38 qualified objects?

Might be the same type of issue for REF and REFFLD specs that qualify the
object.

- Dan Bale
(I am *NOT* "Dale"
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html )

Neil Palmer wrote:

That would only affect you if you had something like a CLP program with
type CLP38 instead of CLP.
The attribute on the files would make no difference for PF, LF etc.  There
are some differences between PRTF38 and PRTF though.

...Neil