RE: File attributes PF38, LF38, PF38-DTA, PF38-SRC -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: File attributes PF38, LF38, PF38-DTA, PF38-SRC
From: "Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:25:01 -0400
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Neil, I'm not sure if I'm mismembering this, but if any object references
are qualified with library names in DDS source, I believe the syntax is
object.library for s38 types vs. library/object for as400 native types.

- Dan Bale
(I am *NOT* "Dale"
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html )

Neil Palmer wrote:

Just an old S/W package and didn;t want to recreate all the files.  True,
it doesn't affect anything, but there's a certain perception if you look
at the library and see file types PF38, LF38 etc. onstead of PF, LF..

...Neil

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.