|
>You can word things in ways as not to offend someone without having to >put the phrase "no offense". That immediately sends the message that >you are about to offend but since I said "no offense" it is ok. <snip> I take it you've never read a response from Simon... <g> Actually, now *I'm* afraid to say anything. I personally did not find anything offensive in that wording. I know nothing about DNS. Do I want someone to write a treatise in order to be politically correct and not "offend"? NO! Just give me the straight juice! Jeez, give me a swift kick in the pants anyday to help me avoid serious pain in the future. I just had to try something. What if Adam had written: "Modifying host files is the wrong direction, IMHO. Modifying local host files is only good for testing purposes. Starting to do that for production is a bad practice to start." Did that basically say the same thing? Is it PC now? "IMHO" could be the PC way to indicate "No offense, but". <deep sigh> You know, there are some on this list that participate regularly. If the high-volume non-lurkers who reply to queries have to PC proof their replies before hitting Send, they'll think twice before participating again, and we'll all lose. Now if someone says "you're a jacka$$ for doing it that way", then I'd suggest there was a problem. BTW, was Justin offended? - Dan <Can't we all just get along> Bale (I am *NOT* "Dale" http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html )
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.