Re: We've Added more memory...but I can't remember!

but does that logic REALLY work?
And does it work within the pool structure you currently have?


>From: vhamberg@attbi.com
>Reply-To: midrange-l@midrange.com
>To: midrange-l@midrange.com
>Subject: Re: We've Added more memory...but I can't remember!
>Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:16:52 +0000
>
>Easy way is to set QPFRADJ to adjust pools at IPL. It'll
>take the recommended formulaic stuff from Work
>Management and apply it.
> > ...if I need to "goose" up the machine pool with additional "wattage".
> >
> > the memory was added because we got a great deal on the chips NOT
>because we
> > were experiencing problems. I believe all of the additional "K" was
>dumped
> > into *BASE but I'm not certain.
> > Does anyone remember/know if memory additions ALWAYS dump into Base?
> > If it does, any GENERAL rule of thumb to follow for incrementing the
>MACHINE
> > pool? I believe I OVER-allocated memory to the "SPOOL POOL" by granting
>an
> > average of 300 K per active writer. Any thoughts on that as well...or
> > anything else memory-pool related?
> >
> > Thanks all.
> >
> > Rick Rayburn
> >
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com