|
Joe, I would think that should be enough. I thought they require about 400 CPW minimum. I'm running 4.0.2 on an LPAR with about 440 batch CPW and WAS comes up OK. Bloat yes. Mooooooooooooo! I run a 1GHz/512MB PC for the console, and I sure wouldn't want to see it on anything slower, like the fellow with 300MHz. My console starts in about 3 or 4 minutes. This article, tweaks for underpowered machine: http://www-912.ibm.com/s_dir/slkbase.NSF/c1309d212e616c9f862569ec0070adc1/c9 329187631b353e862569ad00404708?OpenDocument Is there a firewall between your console and AS/400? Maybe you need to open some more ports. -Marty --__--__-- From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> Subject: RE: Problem with admistrative console Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:13:31 -0500 Reply-To: midrange-l@midrange.com > From: Urbanek, Marty > > Also, you might try starting it from qshell via STRWASINST. Thanks, Marty. I may be forced to do the STRWASINST at some point. And it may well be that the machine is underpowered. It's a model 720 rated at 420/240 CPW. It's sad, though, that I was able to run WebSphere V2.0 on my model 150 (albeit very slowly) with 35CPW. Software bloat. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.