|
-- -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] IBM does not want to advertise and now it wants to discourage software developers and business partners from the iSeries. Either IBM wants the box to die-flat out dead or all profit no expense with soring g sales and revenues. Does the drop in sales and revenue any indicator that their formulas are wrong for success and right for failure? IBM is discouraging everyone from helping **STUPID A. Ports -- From: "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com> To: "'midrange-l@midrange.com'" <midrange-l@midrange.com> Subject: RE: Developer Lease to 1.75%???? Sender: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: midrange-l@midrange.com Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:47:38 -0400 >Does it affect existing leases, or only new ones? Joe, obviously I don't speak for IBM legal, but a lease is a binding contract so I think they'd have a hard time changing the exiting ones. If they can do that, maybe I'll change my lease to .05% per month on my own. <G> Never the less, the notice after the fact doesn't exactly give us time to react and get new leases in before the increase. Al, hasn't IBM ever heard of a loss-leader? IBM SHOULD loose money on the development machines, it's the ISVs out there that write the software the IBM needs to have in the market so they can sell the big machines that they make lots of money on. -Walden ------------ Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -----Original Message----- From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@plutabrothers.com] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:51 To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: RE: Developer Lease to 1.75%???? > From: Al Barsa > > IBM has been literally giving away these machines, and (even though I > have several systems leased this way) I don't think that this is > unreasonable. Perhaps it's reaonable, Al, but it nearly doubles my fixed costs, pushing me even closer to the edge. No early termination is also a nasty little change. Does it affect existing leases, or only new ones? If only new ones, it's more palatable. If it changes existing leases, this sort of decision, without any warning, shows a complete lack or regard for the small developer. Joe _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.