× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. June 2002

RE: upgrade frequency (was RE: Since when is adding DASD so difficult?)

We're not really "forced" off of the release, but IBM will not create future
fixes (unless you pay them more) for the older releases. If they're
"perfectly good" they shouldn't need any more fixes anyway. We JUST went
from 4.4 to 5.1 in March. I know that for at least the 6 months prior to
that I don't remember any new hipers or DB PTFs even being released. You're
right - the release was very stable. Now, since we're at 5.1, I'm having to
readjust to scheduling IPLs due to the frequency of PTFs. We're still only
IPLing about every month and a half or so, so that's not bad at all.

Chris

> I have no problem with the frequency of new releases. I do resent
> being forced
> off a perfectly good release, though I realize that all vendors resist
> providing support for "old" software.
>
>
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.