× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Steve,

According to 'Fortress Rochester' by Frank Soltis, the new processor has a
different architecture such that its clock speed will be higher than the
previous processor when providing the same throughput.  Therefore, a part of
the increased clock speed is just due to this new architecture and doesn't
add any new actual speed.  This is also part of the reason that the older
processers clock speed seemed so low, it was due to the architecture.

I don't have the book here at work so I can't reference the exact section
but this is how I remember it.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Richter [mailto:srichter@autocoder.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 5:05 AM
> To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: as/400 / linux / lpar
>
> I am still looking for the reason the cpw per processor of
> the new regatta
> 890 is only 40% more than that of the former high end 840.
> Even though the
> clock speed is 100% greater.
>


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.