Re: as/400 / linux / lpar -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: as/400 / linux / lpar
From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 07:49:45 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@attbi.com>

> I believe the issue centers around whether the processor can be partitioned
> based on fractional CPU. One partition using .3 of the CPU, another using
> .7, .e.g. I think this does require newer processors

why is that? It is all done in software anyway. This smacks more of
marketing:
"You gotta upgrade..."

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: as/400 / linux / lpar , Larry Bolhuis

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.