RE: as/400 / linux / lpar

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Latest  hardware & latest  release
         Glenn

At 07:14 AM 05/31/2002 -0500, Vernon Hamberg wrote:
>I believe the issue centers around whether the processor can be partitioned
>based on fractional CPU. One partition using .3 of the CPU, another using
>.7, .e.g. I think this does require newer processors. What they call 'Linux
>Shared Processor' is the hard way to say it's using a fraction of the CPU.
>
>At 04:57 AM 5/31/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>Rob,
>>
>>I went back to the chart and looked; I was unable to find any
>>uni-processor models which were listed as supporting Linux but not
>>supporting 'Linux Shared Processor'.  As you imply in your note, it
>>would be a theoretical impossibility.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Andy Nolen-Parkhouse
>>
>> > Subject: RE: as/400 / linux / lpar
>> > What is the difference between being able to run Linux on a single
>> > processor and 'Linux Shared Processor'?  On the chart I see that some
>> > single processors support LPAR, and Linux but not 'Linux Shared
>> > Processor'.
>> >
>> > Rob Berendt
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--