×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




None of these objects have any "duplicates" elsewhere on the system.
However, after having checked into this a bit more, it appears that these
are objects that we have on our other system.  Perhaps at one point, these
objects did "belong" on this box, but then a new 400 was installed to
offload some of that; objects/libraries may have been deleted, but perhaps
the system just didn't put the finishing touch on them.

I will back up QRCL.  Should I then delete library QRCL?  Or just clear it?

- Dan Bale
(I am *NOT* "Dale"
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html )
SAMSA, Inc.
989-790-0507
DBale@SAMSA.com <mailto:DBale@SAMSA.com>
  Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
  (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
[mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of rob@dekko.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:44 AM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: What to do with QRCL objects after RCLSTG



Dan,

Probably not the answer you wanted to hear.  But I always ignore these.
Never ran into a problem.  You can spot check a few of them and see if the
original object still exists.

Rob Berendt



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.