|
James, Generally speaking, when an IBM command dumps like that, I would start looking for PTF's or corrupted data. Regardless of 80-85% of disk usage may be scary, but it should not cause significant problems such as you describe. Are you reasonably current on PTF's to your operating system? What version/release are you running? What is your total system capacity? As far as getting more disk space, below are some thoughts (not meant to be a comprehensive list nor are they in any specific order, but I think I got most of the big ones): - Use the RTVDSKINF and PRTDSKINF commands. Run the RTVDSKINF command at night as it will run for a long time. On the PRTDSKINF command, use the *LIB parameter. This will give you a listing of your libraries and their sizes. If I recall correctly, it will also give you a list of the largest objects on your system. Do you know what all the libraries represent? Are there old test libraries which could be backed off and deleted? Do the sizes seem reasonable? - Examine your database files. Some of your larger files may contain a high percentage of deleted records. This space may be reclaimed using the RGZPFM command. WARNING - you need to verify that your applications do not access information in the files using relative record numbers prior to using this command. Do this at night as the command requires exclusive access. - Delete old spool files. Examine all of the output queues on your system. Do you have a reasonable number of spool files? Do you know why they are there? Are there many of those annoying dumps? If you delete a large number of spools, then run the RCLSPLSTG command in batch to remove the excess members of the spool physical files. - Look at the IFS directories. Use the WRKLNK or Operations Navigator to browse through the contents of your non-library storage. Don't forget the folders in QDLS. If you seem to have a high volume of files in your directories, find out how they got there. Did someone use the IFS to back up the C drive of their PC? - If you have large numbers of deleted records in a file beginning with 'QADB' in one of your system libraries, then you might benefit from using the RCLSTG command. This will also find and remove those damaged objects which are not in libraries. You may or may not get much space back from this command. If you have had a significant failure like losing power and dropping like a rock, then you would probably benefit from this. Schedule on a weekend when you can dedicate the system for a very long time. - Examine your applications. Many transaction systems maintain historical data for analysis. If you have large volumes of transaction data, have those people who are responsible for the application run the purge of the older data. There are good business reasons to keep a lot of history, but if that is the case, let the folks know that you need more storage and the choice may be between their history and buying more disks. - Don't sweat the small stuff. If you find yourself spending an hour a day policing the system for extra space and you've done all of the reasonable things like those above, buy more disk! It is reasonable that a system grows over time. If you become a disk space fanatic, you will be shunned in the cafeteria and your friends will start to avoid you. It's not worth it, get your technical specs together and get management to buy more storage. Regards, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse > Subject: Displaying contents of spool files. > > Hi Guys, > > Well I have a slight problem with displaying contents of spool files of > certain users (occurs randomly). They try to display their prints and it > just starts to do a dump, it hangs that interactive session up for a few > minutes. I looked at the job log and it displays the following message > > > 3>> wrksplf leonid > space offset X'004687700' or teraspace offset X'0000000000000000' > outside current limit for object QWCBT01. > Dump output directed to spool file1. > Complete thread information not available. > > > I tried increasing the SYSVAL QJOBSPLA from 2048 KB to 3516KB, the SYSVAL > QMAXSPLF is sitting at 9999. > We are having extreme difficulties with our disk usage, on average around > 80% to 85%. Are these to problems related? Any suggestions on what to do > to > get more disk space? > > Thanks for the help, > > James
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.