|
Pat Barber wrote: > They might do away with the term "IOP" but they will never do > away with seperate intelligent processor(s) handling disk I/O. > > That's one of the "major" differences in the 400 vs > everything else.... Pat, the following excerpt is from an article Frank Soltis wrote for iSeries Network, entitled "The Making of an IBM Software Powerhouse: ---------------------------------------- Lest you believe that only the processor hardware is converging, we are also working to converge the I/O hardware on these three platforms. It is a well-known fact that today there is a difference between the I/O of the iSeries and the I/O of the pSeries. The iSeries uses I/O processors (IOPs); the pSeries does not. This too will change as we move to an I/O architecture that no longer requires IOPs. The new I/O architecture, called InfiniBand, will (over the next couple of years) replace the current Peripheral Component Interface (PCI) bus architecture used in today's eServers. Because InfiniBand is a channel with far more built-in intelligence than a PCI bus has, there will no longer be a need for IOPs to provide that level of intelligence. As a result, common I/O will exist across all eServers, including the zSeries and the xSeries. ---------------------------------------- Never say never.... <g> Regards, John Taylor
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.