|
Agreed, the better performance comes with sequential processing, I believe. At 02:21 PM 3/22/02 -0500, you wrote: > >From: Buck Calabro [mailto:Buck.Calabro@commsoft.net] > >AND you do most of your read/chains by item number > >Don't you only see an improvement if you read several records in a row? In >other words, if I reorg by item number and then I chain to item 1 then 9883 >then 7332 then 2332 then 123 I should see no performance gain even though >I'm accessing "by item number". However, if I chain or setll to 5 then read >6, 7, 8 and 9 I would see the gain, right? > >-Walden > > >------------ >Walden H Leverich III >President >Tech Software >(516) 627-3800 x11 >(208) 692-3308 eFax >WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com >http://www.TechSoftInc.com > >_______________________________________________ >This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list >To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com >To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, >visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l >or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com >Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives >at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
