× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



>From: Buck Calabro [mailto:Buck.Calabro@commsoft.net]
>AND you do most of your read/chains by item number

Don't you only see an improvement if you read several records in a row? In
other words, if I reorg by item number and then I chain to item 1 then 9883
then 7332 then 2332 then 123 I should see no performance gain even though
I'm accessing "by item number". However, if I chain or setll to 5 then read
6, 7, 8 and 9 I would see the gain, right?

-Walden


------------
Walden H Leverich III
President
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
(208) 692-3308 eFax
WaldenL@TechSoftInc.com
http://www.TechSoftInc.com



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.