|
Dan Bale wrote: >First, the accusation is based on WRKQRY >*QRYDFN objects being converted to QM via >RTVQMQRY. The complaint I expressed is >with the way RTVQMQRY converts to SQL, >not necessarily QM itself. Ah. That makes sense. I was afraid I'd left a bunch of QMQRY timebombs in my code. >Buck, have you had no problems converting >queries with joins? Sure, but that's been documented so long I take it for granted. I expect that I will need to re-work converted queries. I look at it in much the same way I look at my home-grown RTVDDSSRC; the output is a starting place, not the end-result. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.