Re: SQL Existence Check -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: SQL Existence Check
From: bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:10:50 -0500
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>From: "Peter Dow" <pcdow@yahoo.com>
>Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 08:23:03 -0800
>
>I'm a little late to this discussion.  If you're using SETLL
>with an equal indicator, and the record is not found, what
>does SETLL set the current record pointer to?

Peter, the equal indicator doesn't affect which record SETLL
chooses.  The current record pointer would be set to a record
below the key value.

Barbara Morris

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: SQL Existence Check , Peter Dow

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.