|
> From: "Joe Pluta" > I tried to not respond, but I just can't. I find myself forced > to ask the obvious question: > Why not use a CHAIN? You took the first thought that came to my mind and put it into words <smile>. Or, why not use SETLL for better performance? My later thoughts degraded to the cynical. Like, why do people insist in looking beyond the obvious? Or, go ahead and try to find an SQL equivalent to SETLL. Or, maybe the question pertains to the elusive challenge of platform independence? Anyway, good question. Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.