|
If you're an application developer moving out of 5250 mode and getting into serious design (MVC stuff), it doesn't make sense to ignore other platforms. I face customers on a regular basis walking away from my iSeries application simply because it's iSeries. If my application became available on another platform, I'd stand a fighting chance of winning the business. There is another group of customers unconcerned with/oblivious to TCO concerns; other platforms may appear to be cheaper (even after I tacked on a big support contract) and that opens another door for a sale. Although my credible experience with other platforms is limited, I'm not so much of a Chauvinist that I believe nobody else on the planet has data queues, record level access, system API's (although with MS, you never know), etc. My proof is simple: look at all the big-time applications running on non-iSeries/non-mainframe platforms. It's probably ugly, but people do it and people buy it. John's mention of the Law of Unintended Consequences got me started on this. If IBM's trying to force us to HTML with tools and facilities that are charitably described as a work in progress, they're pushing us into an area where IBM's not prepared while alienating customers with 5250 taxes. IBM acts like a corporate St. Patrick: they're driving the green-screen snake out of the iSeries (and don't try to ruin my metaphor by telling me there are no snakes in Ireland). We still have Newton's Third Law... -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Nathan M. Andelin Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 6:21 PM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: The law of unintended consequences From: "Reeve Fritchman" <reeve@ltl400.com> > Wouldn't it be amusing if IBM really did have a warm spot > in its cold corporate heart for the iSeries, only to see the product > base erode as applications being migrated out of 5250 mode ended > up running in non-iSeries environments? Someday, the user interface may be HTML, instead of 5250 based. But which applications would move? It's pretty hard to build an iSeries application that doesn't use at least some OS/400 specific features. Data queues, message queues, output queues, spool files, CL modules & commands, system APIs, record level database access, security objects, RPG, backup & restore procedures, etc. Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.