|
Joe Pluta wrote: > Each of these options has its place. Personally, I spent several years > creating a highly sophisticated thick client interface using OS/2 and > OS/400, only to find that the implementation hurdles were every bit as > difficult to overcome as the design and implementation of the product. > Currently, I provide an HTML interface that requires absolutely no PC > software, either for development or deployment, and I'm finding that the > management issue is almost complete removed. > > Joe And that's the difference between thick and thin clients. Thin clients do communication and presentation, thick clients run logic (and often process files) on the client. -- Brad Jensen brad@elstore.com President Electronic Storage Corporation Tulsa OK USA 918-664-7276 LaserVault Report Retrieval & Data Mining www.Laservault.com www.eufrates.com - Add distance learning to your site with easy course preparation
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
